Losing a family member in a preventable accident is devastating, particularly when the death results from the negligence of an employee working for a large corporation. A commercial truck driver may cause a fatal collision, a construction worker may create dangerous conditions that result in a deadly accident, or a company employee may fail to follow established safety procedures while operating heavy machinery. When these tragedies occur, surviving families often face substantial financial losses, including funeral expenses, lost household income, and the loss of financial support their loved one would have provided for years. Although an individual employee may have directly caused the accident, Mississippi law may also hold the corporation responsible under established principles of employer liability. Families who lose loved ones because of legally actionable employee negligence may have grounds to pursue substantial compensation through a Mississippi wrongful death lawsuit.
I am Jonathan Barrett, a Mississippi wrongful death attorney and founder of Barrett Law, PLLC, located in Madison, Mississippi. I represent families throughout the state in serious wrongful death and personal injury cases involving negligent companies, dangerous commercial operations, and preventable fatal accidents. When an employee’s negligence causes a death, I investigate whether the corporation can be held responsible for the employee’s conduct and whether the company independently failed to fulfill its safety obligations. These cases may involve commercial liability insurance, corporate safety policies, employee training records, and substantial financial damages. My objective is to identify the responsible parties, protect the family’s legal rights, and pursue compensation supported by Mississippi law.
Mississippi Wrongful Death Law and Corporate Responsibility for Fatal Accidents
Mississippi Code § 11-7-13 establishes the legal framework for wrongful death claims arising from negligent or otherwise legally actionable conduct. The statute recognizes that certain surviving family members may pursue compensation when a person’s death results from wrongful conduct that would have supported a legal claim had the individual survived. Its language expressly recognizes potential liability involving corporations and other legally responsible parties. Consequently, a business cannot automatically avoid civil responsibility merely because an individual employee committed the negligent act that caused the death. However, the family must establish a legally recognized basis for holding the corporation responsible.
Mississippi Code § 11-7-13 provides that a wrongful death action may arise when a death results from a “real, wrongful or negligent act or omission.” The statute also recognizes certain claims involving unsafe machinery, equipment, and other legally actionable conduct. These provisions may apply to fatal commercial vehicle accidents, dangerous construction operations, industrial incidents, and other situations involving corporate negligence. The family’s right to recover depends on establishing liability, causation, and legally recoverable damages under the circumstances. As a Mississippi wrongful death attorney, I examine the underlying accident and the relationship between the responsible employee and the company.
For example, consider a Mississippi transportation company whose employee causes a fatal collision while operating a commercial delivery truck on Interstate 55. Investigators determine that the driver failed to maintain a proper lookout and struck another vehicle, resulting in the death of its occupant. If the driver was performing assigned work duties when the collision occurred, the employer may face liability under Mississippi’s doctrine of respondeat superior. The family may also have grounds to investigate whether the company violated applicable safety obligations or negligently entrusted the vehicle to an unsafe driver. These circumstances can create a substantial wrongful death claim involving both individual negligence and corporate responsibility.
Corporate Liability Under Mississippi’s Respondeat Superior Doctrine
Mississippi recognizes the legal doctrine of respondeat superior, which allows an employer to be held responsible for certain negligent acts committed by employees within the course and scope of their employment. The doctrine recognizes that companies conduct business through employees and may bear responsibility when employees negligently perform assigned duties. In Mar-Jac Poultry MS, LLC v. Love, 283 So. 3d 34 (Miss. 2019), the Mississippi Supreme Court discussed employer liability and the relationship between an employee’s conduct and the company’s business activities. The critical question is whether the employee was acting in furtherance of the employer’s business when the negligent conduct occurred. An employer is not automatically responsible for every harmful act committed by someone on its payroll.
For example, a commercial driver delivering merchandise to customers is ordinarily performing work that benefits the employer. If the driver negligently causes a fatal accident while completing an assigned delivery, the company may be held responsible for the resulting injuries and death. By contrast, an employee who uses a personal vehicle for an unrelated activity outside their employment may be acting beyond the company’s responsibility under respondeat superior. The distinction depends on the employee’s actual duties, the reason for the activity, and the circumstances of the accident. I examine employment records, work schedules, dispatch instructions, vehicle information, and witness testimony to determine whether the corporation may be held vicariously liable.
Mississippi Code § 85-5-7(2) also addresses the treatment of employers and employees when fault is allocated in civil lawsuits. The statute provides that an employer and employee are considered one defendant for fault-allocation purposes when the employer’s liability results from the employee’s wrongful or negligent conduct. This provision can become significant when multiple parties contributed to a fatal accident. The analysis must distinguish liability based on the employee’s conduct from separate allegations of independent corporate negligence. I evaluate those issues when identifying the appropriate defendants and the claims available to surviving family members.
Fatal Commercial Truck Accidents Caused by Corporate Employees
Commercial trucking accidents are among the most serious examples of employee negligence resulting in corporate wrongful death litigation. A fully loaded tractor-trailer can cause devastating injuries when a driver operates recklessly, fails to maintain a safe distance, becomes distracted, or ignores hazardous driving conditions. Mississippi highways such as Interstates 10, 20, 55, and 59 carry substantial commercial transportation traffic involving large freight carriers and regional delivery companies. A fatal crash may leave families facing immediate funeral expenses and the permanent loss of financial support. When the responsible driver was operating within the course and scope of employment, the trucking company may be liable for the driver’s negligence.
Corporate trucking cases may also involve independent allegations concerning driver qualification, training, vehicle maintenance, or compliance with applicable commercial transportation requirements. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations impose numerous duties on covered motor carriers and commercial drivers, including requirements involving driver qualifications, hours of service, and vehicle inspection. For example, 49 C.F.R. § 390.11 requires motor carriers to ensure that their drivers comply with applicable duties imposed by the regulations. Evidence of relevant violations may help establish negligence when connected to the cause of the collision. However, regulatory noncompliance does not automatically prove that the company caused the death.
These lawsuits may require examination of electronic logging devices, dispatch records, driver qualification files, inspection reports, onboard vehicle data, and communications between the company and its employees. A trucking company may argue that the driver was an independent contractor or that another motorist caused the collision. The true working relationship and the circumstances of the crash may therefore become important legal issues. Additional parties, including maintenance providers or other negligent drivers, may also bear responsibility. I investigate these possibilities when pursuing corporate wrongful death claims involving fatal commercial vehicle accidents.
Negligent Hiring, Training, and Supervision by Mississippi Corporations
Some fatal accidents involve corporate negligence extending beyond the individual employee’s immediate conduct. A company may hire an employee with known safety problems, assign dangerous work without adequate instruction, or disregard repeated warnings about unsafe behavior. In appropriate circumstances, these failures may support claims involving negligent hiring, training, supervision, retention, or entrustment. The existence of corporate liability depends on the duty owed, what the company knew or reasonably should have known, and whether its conduct proximately caused the fatal injury. A company’s decision to employ someone who later causes an accident does not, by itself, prove negligent hiring.
For example, a Mississippi construction company may assign a worker to operate heavy machinery without confirming that the employee possesses the necessary qualifications. If the employee negligently operates the equipment and causes a fatal accident, the company may face questions about training, supervision, and compliance with applicable safety requirements. The investigation may reveal that supervisors previously received warnings about the employee’s unsafe conduct or knew that equipment was being operated improperly. Such evidence may be relevant to establishing independent corporate negligence. However, the family must demonstrate that the alleged failure contributed to the death rather than relying solely on the existence of an unfortunate accident.
Mississippi courts also distinguish independent negligence claims from claims based entirely on vicarious liability. The relationship between these theories can affect which allegations remain relevant when a corporation admits that its employee was acting within the scope of employment. Questions involving negligent hiring, supervision, and entrustment should therefore be evaluated in light of the company’s admissions, the facts supporting each claim, and controlling Mississippi decisions. In serious cases, corporate records may reveal conduct important to liability or the assessment of other legally available remedies. I investigate the company’s conduct independently rather than assuming that every employee negligence case automatically establishes additional corporate wrongdoing.
Fatal Construction Accidents and Corporate Safety Violations
Construction accidents can involve multiple companies, employees, subcontractors, and property owners working at the same location. A fatal accident may occur when an employee improperly operates heavy machinery, fails to secure construction materials, creates a dangerous excavation, or disregards required fall protection procedures. Determining corporate liability can become complicated when several businesses share responsibilities for the project. The company employing the negligent worker may be liable under respondeat superior, while another business may face separate liability if it breached an applicable legal duty. The contractual relationships, site conditions, and actual control over the dangerous work are important to the investigation.
Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations may provide relevant evidence concerning workplace safety requirements. For example, 29 C.F.R. Part 1926 establishes numerous construction safety standards involving fall protection, equipment operation, excavations, and other potentially dangerous activities. A violation may help demonstrate unsafe conduct when the regulation applies and the violation is causally connected to the accident. However, an OSHA violation does not automatically establish an independent private cause of action or guarantee liability. I examine the safety requirements, contracts, witness statements, and available inspection records to determine whether a corporation’s conduct contributed to the fatal accident.
Fatal Industrial Accidents and Dangerous Corporate Operations
Industrial facilities can expose workers, contractors, delivery drivers, and visitors to dangerous machinery, hazardous materials, heavy equipment, and complex operating systems. A fatal accident may occur when an employee fails to secure machinery, improperly operates a forklift, disregards lockout procedures, or creates a dangerous condition during maintenance. The responsible company may face liability when the negligent employee was performing assigned work and the legal requirements for employer responsibility are satisfied. Additional allegations may arise when management failed to enforce appropriate safety procedures or knew about a dangerous condition that contributed to the death. However, the relationship between the deceased individual and the company is especially important in industrial accident cases.
When the deceased person was an employee of the corporation, Mississippi’s workers’ compensation laws may substantially restrict the family’s ability to file an ordinary negligence lawsuit against that employer. Mississippi Code § 71-3-9 generally makes workers’ compensation the exclusive remedy against an employer for compensable workplace injuries and deaths, subject to recognized exceptions. If another company or legally responsible third party caused the accident, a separate wrongful death claim may still be available under Mississippi Code § 71-3-71. The identity of the employer, the relationship between the companies, and the nature of the incident therefore require careful examination. I investigate these issues before determining which corporations or other parties may be sued.
Corporate Responsibility for Fatal Accidents Involving Independent Contractors
Corporations sometimes argue that they are not responsible for a fatal accident because the negligent individual was an independent contractor rather than an employee. Mississippi law generally distinguishes these relationships when determining whether a company is vicariously liable for another person’s conduct. However, the contractual label used by the company does not necessarily resolve the issue. Courts may consider the actual working relationship, including the company’s right to control the manner and means of performing the work. Certain independent duties and recognized exceptions may also create liability even when the negligent person was properly classified as an independent contractor.
For example, a Mississippi corporation may hire a transportation contractor to move heavy industrial equipment between facilities. If a fatal accident occurs, the legal analysis may involve determining whether the corporation controlled the driver’s work, negligently selected the contractor, or independently created a dangerous condition. The company may argue that it had no responsibility for the contractor’s operational decisions. Employment agreements, communications, dispatch records, insurance documents, and evidence of actual supervision may help establish the relevant relationship. I examine these materials to identify the parties with legally enforceable obligations rather than relying solely on how the company describes its workers.
Compensation Available in Mississippi Corporate Wrongful Death Lawsuits
Mississippi Code § 11-7-13 allows qualifying wrongful death beneficiaries to pursue damages resulting from a legally actionable death. Depending on the circumstances, recoverable compensation may include funeral expenses, medical expenses incurred before death, the present net cash value of the deceased person’s expected lifetime earnings and services, and the loss of society and companionship. When the deceased survived for a period after the accident, damages for conscious pain and suffering before death may also be available. The nature of the damages and their distribution depend on the governing statute and the evidence presented. No financial award can replace a family member, but the law recognizes the substantial economic and personal losses caused by wrongful death.
In Long v. McKinney, 897 So. 2d 160 (Miss. 2004), the Mississippi Supreme Court addressed the recovery and distribution of damages in wrongful death litigation. The decision distinguishes between categories of compensation associated with the decedent and damages belonging to qualifying beneficiaries. This distinction matters because the same lawsuit may involve funeral costs, final medical expenses, future financial losses, and the separate losses suffered by surviving family members. The amount recoverable depends on evidence concerning the deceased person’s earnings, age, health, family relationships, and other relevant circumstances. I examine these factors when evaluating the financial damages arising from a fatal corporate accident.
For example, a 42-year-old parent who dies because of a corporation’s employee negligence may have provided substantial financial support and household services for decades. An economic analysis may consider the person’s work history, expected earnings, employment benefits, and likely future contributions to the family. The surviving spouse and children may also have legally recognized losses involving companionship and the family relationship. However, a claim involving several million dollars in potential economic damages requires reliable supporting evidence rather than assumptions about future income. I work to identify the recoverable categories of loss and the documentation necessary to support them.
Punitive Damages Against Corporations for Fatal Employee Negligence
Some fatal accidents involve conduct substantially more serious than ordinary negligence. A corporation may knowingly permit dangerous operations, disregard repeated safety warnings, or authorize conduct showing a reckless disregard for the safety of others. Mississippi Code § 11-1-65 establishes requirements governing punitive damages in applicable civil actions. The statute generally requires clear and convincing evidence of actual malice, actual fraud, or gross negligence demonstrating willful, wanton, or reckless disregard for the safety of others. Punitive damages are not automatically available simply because an accident caused a death or involved a large corporation.
Corporate punitive liability may also require evaluating whether the relevant aggravated misconduct can legally be attributed to the company. Evidence involving management decisions, prior warnings, safety violations, and corporate policies may become important when the conduct meets applicable legal requirements. However, an employee’s ordinary negligent mistake does not automatically justify punitive damages against the employer. Courts must first determine whether the evidence permits the punitive damages issue to proceed under the governing statutory procedures. I evaluate potential punitive damages separately from compensatory recovery to determine whether the facts support the heightened legal standards.
Commercial Insurance Coverage in High-Value Corporate Wrongful Death Cases
Corporations frequently maintain substantial liability insurance coverage because their operations expose them to serious accident risks. A trucking company may carry commercial automobile liability coverage, while a manufacturer or commercial property owner may have general liability insurance and additional umbrella or excess policies. When an employee causes a fatal accident within the scope of employment, the company’s insurance may provide a source of compensation for qualifying claims. However, the existence of a large insurance policy does not establish that the corporation was negligent or that the family is automatically entitled to receive the policy limits. Liability, covered damages, exclusions, and the applicable insurance provisions must be examined separately.
In some cases, multiple insurance policies may apply to the same fatal incident. A corporation may maintain primary liability coverage together with umbrella or excess insurance that becomes relevant when the underlying policy limits are exhausted according to the contracts. Other potentially responsible companies may carry separate coverage. Identifying these policies can become especially important when the deceased person was a primary wage earner and the family faces substantial lifetime financial losses. I examine the available insurance arrangements and legally responsible parties to determine which sources of recovery may be implicated.
An insurer’s refusal to settle a wrongful death claim is also legally distinct from a first-party insurance bad faith claim. The injured family’s claim ordinarily arises against the negligent parties, while an insurer’s duties to defend and settle are generally owed to its insured under the applicable policy and law. Families do not automatically acquire a direct bad faith claim against the corporation’s liability insurer merely because settlement negotiations are unsuccessful. The appropriate legal strategy must account for those distinctions while preserving claims against the responsible corporation. I focus on establishing liability and the family’s damages while evaluating insurance coverage issues that may affect recovery.
Mississippi Comparative Negligence and Corporate Fault Allocation
Corporate defendants frequently argue that the deceased person or another party contributed to the fatal accident. Mississippi Code § 11-7-15 establishes a comparative negligence rule under which the injured person’s negligence generally does not automatically bar recovery, but damages may be reduced in proportion to the negligence attributed to that person. For example, if a jury determines that a deceased motorist was 20 percent responsible for a fatal collision, the recoverable damages may be reduced accordingly. The actual outcome depends on the facts, the legal claims, and the fault allocation supported by the evidence. These issues are particularly important in complex commercial accidents involving several drivers or companies.
Mississippi Code § 85-5-7 also addresses the allocation of responsibility among multiple defendants. The statute generally provides for several liability based on each defendant’s proportionate fault, subject to specified exceptions, while treating an employer and employee as one defendant when the employer’s liability results from the employee’s conduct. A corporation may therefore seek to attribute fault to another driver, contractor, equipment manufacturer, or other responsible party. These arguments can significantly affect the recoverable judgment. I investigate all potential causes of the accident and evaluate the evidence supporting or disputing allegations of comparative fault.
Evidence Needed to Prove Corporate Negligence After a Fatal Accident
Wrongful death claims against corporations frequently require evidence that goes beyond the initial police report or accident investigation. Employment records, company safety manuals, training documentation, maintenance reports, surveillance recordings, and communications may help establish whether the employee was performing assigned duties and whether the corporation failed to fulfill applicable safety obligations. In commercial vehicle cases, electronic logging devices, vehicle data, dispatch records, and driver qualification files may be especially important. Industrial accidents may require machinery inspections, workplace safety records, and testimony from individuals familiar with the company’s operating procedures. Preserving this evidence promptly can be essential to establishing liability.
Corporations may possess important records that are not immediately available to surviving family members. Electronic data may be overwritten, equipment may be repaired, and employees may leave the company before litigation begins. A formal preservation demand may help identify materials that should be maintained, while discovery procedures can provide access to relevant information after a lawsuit is filed. Depending on the circumstances, accident reconstruction professionals, engineers, economists, and other qualified witnesses may help explain causation and damages. I evaluate the evidence necessary to establish both the employee’s negligence and the legal grounds for holding the corporation responsible.
Mississippi Filing Deadlines for Corporate Wrongful Death Claims
Mississippi Code § 15-1-49 generally establishes a three-year statute of limitations for negligence-based civil actions when another specific limitations period does not apply. Many wrongful death claims arising from ordinary negligence are governed by this general period, but the appropriate deadline depends on the underlying cause of action and the circumstances of the death. Claims involving certain intentional torts, medical malpractice, governmental defendants, or other specially regulated matters may be subject to different deadlines and procedural requirements. The wrongful death statute does not establish one universal filing period for every fatal accident. A family should therefore avoid assuming that three years is available without examining the specific claim.
The investigation should begin promptly because important evidence may disappear well before the legal filing deadline. Surveillance recordings, vehicle data, workplace records, and witness recollections can become more difficult to obtain over time. A company may also contend that a different limitations period or statutory notice requirement applies. Filing too late can prevent recovery regardless of the seriousness of the alleged negligence. I examine the accident date, responsible parties, potential claims, and applicable deadlines to determine what steps are necessary to preserve the family’s rights.
Legal Representation for Mississippi Families Pursuing Corporate Wrongful Death Claims
Wrongful death litigation against a corporation can involve extensive evidence, substantial financial damages, and complicated questions concerning employee conduct and corporate responsibility. A company may deny that its employee caused the accident, argue that the worker was acting outside the scope of employment, or contend that another party was responsible. Corporate defendants may also dispute the family’s financial losses or raise comparative negligence arguments intended to reduce liability. The investigation must address these defenses while establishing the deceased person’s financial contributions and the losses suffered by surviving beneficiaries. A carefully developed case may require legal discovery, technical evidence, and testimony concerning both accident causation and damages.
At Barrett Law, PLLC, I represent Mississippi families who have lost loved ones because of negligent drivers, unsafe commercial operations, and other legally actionable conduct. I examine the circumstances of the fatal accident, investigate the relationship between the employee and employer, identify potentially responsible corporations, and evaluate available insurance coverage. When the evidence supports liability, I pursue appropriate compensation through negotiations or wrongful death litigation. My objective is to protect the legal rights of surviving family members and hold responsible parties accountable under Mississippi law. Families dealing with fatal commercial transportation accidents can also review my firm’s information about Mississippi trucking accident claims.
Frequently Asked Questions About Corporate Wrongful Death Claims in Mississippi
Can I Sue a Corporation if One of Its Employees Caused My Family Member’s Death?
Yes. Mississippi law may allow a wrongful death lawsuit against a corporation when its employee negligently causes a fatal accident while acting within the course and scope of employment. This form of employer responsibility is generally known as respondeat superior. The corporation may also face separate claims when its own negligent hiring, supervision, training, or other conduct contributed to the death. However, the family must establish the applicable legal duties, negligent conduct, and causal connection to the fatal accident. I examine the employee’s responsibilities and the company’s actions to determine whether a corporate wrongful death claim is supported.
Can a Mississippi Family Recover Millions of Dollars From a Corporation After a Fatal Accident?
A Mississippi family may recover substantial compensation when the evidence establishes liability and significant legally recoverable damages. The potential value may depend on the deceased person’s expected lifetime earnings, financial contributions, household services, family relationships, and other circumstances recognized by Mississippi law. Medical and funeral expenses and qualifying losses involving companionship and society may also be considered. However, the existence of substantial corporate assets or large liability insurance limits does not automatically establish a multimillion-dollar recovery. I evaluate the specific damages and supporting evidence rather than assigning a settlement value based solely on the defendant company’s financial resources.
Can a Mississippi Corporation Be Sued for Negligently Hiring an Employee Who Caused a Fatal Accident?
A corporation may face a negligent hiring claim when the applicable legal requirements are satisfied and its hiring decision contributed to the fatal accident. For example, a transportation company may face questions about its hiring practices if it placed an unqualified driver behind the wheel despite information establishing a foreseeable safety risk. However, evidence of a prior driving violation or employment problem does not automatically prove negligent hiring. The family must establish the company’s relevant duty, failure to exercise reasonable care, and causal relationship to the death. I examine employment records, driver qualifications, relevant safety warnings, and the circumstances surrounding the accident.
Can I Sue Both the Negligent Employee and the Corporation in Mississippi?
Mississippi law generally permits a qualifying plaintiff to bring negligence claims against an employee, the employer, or both when the requirements for vicarious liability are satisfied. In Methodist Healthcare-Olive Branch Hospital v. McNutt, the Mississippi Supreme Court discussed this principle and the relationship between employee negligence and employer liability. However, Mississippi Code § 85-5-7 contains important rules governing fault allocation when multiple parties are responsible. Settlement agreements and releases must also be evaluated carefully because releasing one party can affect certain claims against another. I examine the legal relationships and potential defendants before determining how the wrongful death lawsuit should be structured.
Can a Family Sue a Corporation for a Fatal Accident That Happened at Work?
The answer depends on whether the deceased person was employed by the corporation being sued or was an employee of another company, contractor, or visitor. Mississippi’s workers’ compensation exclusivity rule under § 71-3-9 generally limits ordinary negligence lawsuits against a covered employer for a compensable workplace death. However, recognized exceptions may apply, and § 71-3-71 preserves certain claims against legally responsible third parties. For example, a subcontractor’s employee killed because of another company’s negligence may have legal options that differ from a claim against the deceased worker’s own employer. I examine the employment relationships, insurance arrangements, and circumstances of the accident before identifying the appropriate claims.
How Long Does a Mississippi Family Have to Sue a Corporation for Wrongful Death?
Many Mississippi wrongful death claims arising from ordinary negligence are subject to the general three-year limitations period under Mississippi Code § 15-1-49. However, different filing periods may apply when the death involves an intentional tort, medical malpractice, governmental entity, or another specially regulated claim. The correct deadline depends on the legal basis for the lawsuit and the circumstances surrounding the death. Families should also consider that important evidence can disappear long before the limitations period expires. I recommend investigating potential corporate liability promptly to identify the applicable deadline and preserve the evidence necessary to support the case.
Call Mississippi Wrongful Death Attorney Jonathan Barrett 24/7/365 at (601) 790-1505 for Your FREE Consultation
When a corporation’s employee causes a fatal accident, the surviving family may face devastating emotional and financial consequences that continue for years. You may have lost a spouse, parent, child, or another loved one because of a negligent commercial driver, unsafe construction operation, industrial accident, or preventable corporate safety failure. I am Jonathan Barrett, a Mississippi wrongful death attorney and founder of Barrett Law, PLLC, and I represent families pursuing claims involving serious negligence and corporate responsibility throughout the state. I can investigate the fatal accident, examine whether the employee was acting within the scope of employment, identify potentially negligent corporate conduct, and evaluate the financial damages available under Mississippi law. My objective is to hold legally responsible parties accountable while pursuing the compensation available to surviving family members.
Barrett Law, PLLC, represents wrongful death clients throughout Mississippi, including Madison, Jackson, Ridgeland, Hattiesburg, Gulfport, Biloxi, Tupelo, Meridian, Oxford, Southaven, and surrounding communities. If your loved one died because of an employee’s negligence while working for a corporation, you should understand your legal rights before accepting an insurance settlement or assuming that only the individual employee can be held responsible. Corporate accident investigations may involve important employment records, electronic evidence, safety documentation, and insurance coverage that should be examined promptly.
Call Mississippi wrongful death attorney Jonathan Barrett at (601) 790-1505, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, for your FREE consultation.
You can also contact Barrett Law, PLLC online to discuss the fatal accident and the legal options available to your family.
